Open-source ecosystem for in vitro and microphysiological systems
Save the DateDecember 1-2, 2026Charlotte, North Carolina12th Annual Regenerative Manufacturing Innovation Consortium (RegMIC) Meeting: A Roadmap for Tissue Organoids and Body-on-a-Chip Manufacturing Standards
Back to Home

Contributor metadata

Metadata that makes submissions searchable and reusable

PhysioVerse uses flexible component and process descriptors so contributors can describe complex model systems without forcing one label. The same metadata helps reviewers evaluate submissions and helps users find relevant datasets later.

Why this matters

Good search starts with clear submission metadata

Terms such as organoid, organ-on-chip, body-on-chip, and tissue chip are useful, but they do not always describe what a system contains or how it was generated. Many datasets include multiple cell sources, materials, devices, culture processes, perturbations, assays, and data modalities.

PhysioVerse therefore asks contributors to describe the dataset through searchable descriptors. Contributors can select multiple options and add an explanation when they choose Other or when a system does not fit existing choices.

View Submission Guide

Metadata should help answer

  • What system was studied?
  • What biological components were included?
  • How was the system generated or treated?
  • What was measured?
  • Which files or links belong to the dataset?
  • What information is needed for review and reuse?

Descriptor groups

What contributors are asked to describe

These descriptor groups are used in the submission form and in the Find Data filters. They are meant to be flexible: contributors can select more than one option and use Other when a term is missing.

System and architecture

Helps users find datasets by the type of model system without forcing one label.

Examples: Organoid, spheroid, tissue chip, organ-on-chip, body-on-chip, barrier model, perfused system, hybrid/custom system.

Cell source and biological context

Describes where the biological material comes from and what it represents.

Examples: Primary, tumor-derived, iPSC-derived, immortalized, co-culture, species, tissue or organ, disease context.

Components, materials, and devices

Captures the physical and biological parts that influence system behavior.

Examples: Epithelial, endothelial, immune, stromal, neuronal, or cardiac components; scaffold, matrix, hydrogel, device material, flow or mechanical context.

Processes and perturbations

Explains how the system was generated, maintained, matured, treated, or challenged.

Examples: Directed differentiation, self-assembly, perfusion, maturation, drug exposure, toxicant exposure, infection, hypoxia, or genetic perturbation.

Assays and data modalities

Connects what was measured to the files or repository links provided by the contributor.

Examples: Imaging, histology, transcriptomics, single-cell data, proteomics, metabolomics, functional assays, TEER, permeability, viability, secretion, longitudinal measurements.

Files, packages, and provenance

Keeps uploaded data, metadata files, ZIP packages, external links, and processing history connected to the dataset record.

Examples: Raw files, processed files, dataset package ZIP, sample metadata, experimental design file, data dictionary, protocol, README, DOI, accession, repository link.

Required and optional metadata

Only core searchable information is required

PhysioVerse should not make contributors enter fields that do not apply. Core fields are required so a dataset can be identified, attributed, reviewed, and discovered. More detailed sample, treatment, dose, time point, and replicate information should be added when available or relevant.

Required for a searchable submission

  • Dataset title and short description
  • Contributor identity and institution
  • At least one system or architecture descriptor
  • At least one data modality
  • Data location: uploaded files, metadata files, ZIP package, external repository link, or a combination
  • Access and reuse expectations
  • Basic provenance or processing notes

Optional when applicable

Detailed experimental context improves reuse

Optional fields are still valuable. They help reviewers and future users understand sample groups, comparisons, treatments, time points, and file-to-sample relationships. When these details are not relevant, contributors can leave them blank.

Helpful when available

  • Sample IDs or group labels
  • Control, treated, or comparison group
  • Treatment or exposure
  • Dose or concentration
  • Time point or collection time
  • Replicate number
  • Detailed reagent information
  • Assay endpoint details
  • Additional notes for unusual or custom systems

From submission to search

What contributors enter becomes how users find data

Metadata entered during submission becomes the basis for search and review. The table below shows how contributor-provided descriptors connect to dataset discovery.

Contributor providesUsers and reviewers can use it to
System categories and architectureFinding datasets by organoid, chip, tissue model, perfused system, hybrid system, or custom system.
Cell source and componentsFinding datasets by primary cells, tumor-derived systems, iPSC-derived systems, co-cultures, tissue context, or disease model.
Materials, devices, and processesFinding comparable systems by scaffold, matrix, device context, culture process, flow, maturation, exposure, or perturbation.
Data modalities and file rolesFinding records with imaging, omics, functional assays, metadata files, ZIP packages, repository links, or other data products.
Sample and provenance detailsUnderstanding what files represent, what comparisons are possible, and whether the dataset is ready for review or reuse.

Using Other

Other is allowed, but it should be explained

If a contributor chooses Other or describes a custom system, they should add a short explanation. That explanation helps reviewers understand the submission and may help improve future descriptor choices.

This keeps the metadata model flexible without losing the structure needed for search, review, and reuse.

When to use Other

  • The system does not fit an existing category.
  • A material, device, or process is not listed.
  • A modality or assay type is missing from the choices.
  • The dataset uses a novel or hybrid workflow.
  • The contributor needs to preserve terminology used by the source data.

Prepare metadata

Use metadata that makes the dataset understandable before upload

Review the submission guide, prepare core descriptors, and sign in when you are ready to create a dataset record, upload files, link repositories, or submit for review.

Standards and manufacturing partners

MOSSDO and RegMIC

Connect with the organizations advancing consensus standards, validation, and regenerative manufacturing across the PhysioVerse ecosystem.